Spanish Princess Cristina in court as fraud case begins

Spain's Princess Cristina went on trial Monday in a landmark criminal case, accused of helping bankroll a lavish lifestyle with funds her husband received from an alleged scheme to embezzle millions from public contracts for conferences and sporting events.

Cristina and her husband, Inaki Urdangarin, said nothing during the proceedings as their lawyers and attorneys for 16 additional defendants argued why their clients should be excluded from the proceedings with charges dropped.

The 50-year-old Cristina, the sister of King Felipe VI, faces two counts of tax fraud, carrying a maximum prison sentence of eight years, for allegedly failing to declare taxes on personal expenses paid by a real estate company she owned with Urdangarin, an Olympic handball medalist turned businessman.

Her lawyer, Jesus Maria Silva, was joined by a prosecutor and a state attorney representing Spanish tax authorities who said the charges against Cristina should be dropped because officials agreed she committed no crimes and should face at most an administrative fine for tax evasion.

A three-member panel of judges hearing the case will decide in coming weeks whether to side with her supporters or with an investigative judge who spent four years probing the case and ruled it could go forward because of evidence presented by a private anti-corruption group.

The judges will have to weigh whether the couple criminally abused the Aizoon real estate consulting firm described in court papers as a "front company" to fund luxury vacations, throw parties at their modernist Barcelona mansion and pay for salsa dancing classes.

Under a quirk in Spanish law, groups like the Manos Limpias (Clean Hands) organization involved in the princess' trial can pursue criminal charges against people when authorities decide against doing so.

The trial marks the first time that a member of Spain's royal family has faced criminal charges since the monarchy was restored in 1975.

Urdangarin and others are accused of embezzling up to 6.2 million euros ($6.8 million) from contracts which were allegedly inflated or never performed. The princess' husband, formerly the Duke of Palma, is accused of using his title to land the deals for the Noos Institute he ran with a business partner.

Cristina and her husband entered court without speaking to reporters under tight security after authorities detained a protester found nearby with an anti-monarchy flag.

A small group was allowed to protest nearby after the proceedings began — in sharp contrast to 2014 demonstrations by thousands of anti-monarchy protesters while Cristina answered questions posed by an investigative judge.

There are so many defendants and lawyers — plus reporters — covering the case that judicial officials moved the trial from a courthouse to a sprawling complex on the outskirts of Palma de Mallorca normally used for public servant training courses.

The case is being heard in the regional capital of Spain's Balearic Islands because many of Urdangarin's business deals under investigation were for the islands.

Cristina denied knowledge of her husband's activities during the 2014 closed-door court appearance, but judges decided she could be tried for tax fraud in 2007 and 2008.

The details about the couple's lifestyle that emerged from the pre-trial investigation from 2011-2014 outraged Spaniards as the country teetered on the edge of an economic crisis and unemployment hit 27 percent.

The case also hurt Cristina's father, former King Juan Carlos — already smarting from a backlash after he broke his hip during a 2012 elephant-hunting trip seen as an example of royal excess. He abdicated in 2014, saying Spain needed fresh royal blood.

On taking the throne, King Felipe pledged to restore public trust in Spain's monarchy. He later stripped Cristina and her older sister Princess Elena of their roles as official members of the royal family though they have not given up their slots of succession in line for the throne.

Testimony is scheduled to begin Feb. 9 and the trial is expected to last until June.

This article talks about how Spain's Princess Cristina is suspected for fraud with her husband. The article seems to have  a bias toward the Princess actually stealing money from Spain, by not paying taxes and knowing of her husband's activities. The author seems to support the outrage of both the people and the King who stripped Cristina from the royal family, since most of the evidences accuse Cristina and her husband as being guilty. When the author talks about the adversary Spain faced while the princess stole from the country, I feel like no one would particularly feel sympathy for her or her husband. Although the Chicago Tribune doesn't have a tight relation with Spain, I would agree with the fact the author empathizes with the Country.

"Spanish Princess Cristina in Court as Fraud Case Begins." Chicago Tribune. Tribune Wire Reports, 11 Jan. 2016. Web. 11 Jan. 2016. <http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-spanish-princess-trial-20160111-story.html>.